For much of the 20th century and the early years of the 21st century, U.S. roads gradually became safer for pedestrians. However, this trend reversed around the year 2009. Since then, the number of pedestrians killed in traffic accidents has increased by approximately 75%, a development that has concerned the researchers responsible for road safety and public administrations.

Various factors have been identified as possible causes of this increase, such as distraction caused by mobile phones, drug-impaired driving, or the general increase in traffic. However, an investigation based on federal records and automotive industry data points to an element that has often gone unnoticed: the steady growth in the size of vehicles, especially SUVs and pickups.

According to this analysis, current vehicles are considerably larger and taller than they were two decades ago. This change is not just an aesthetic or comfort issue, but it has direct implications for pedestrian safety. Researchers estimate that between 200 and 400 annual deaths could be related to this increase in dimensions. Overall, this would represent approximately 10% of the recent increase in fatalities among pedestrians.

Experts identify two main reasons that explain why large vehicles are more dangerous. The former is the height of the hood. In traditional cars, an impact usually occurs in the leg area, often causing the body to be projected onto the vehicle. In contrast, SUVs and pickups have much higher hoods, which strike directly at the torso or even the head of the pedestrian. This type of impact significantly increases the severity of injuries and raises the risk of the person being dragged or ending up under the vehicle’s wheels.

The second cause is the reduction of visibility. As vehicles have grown, so have their blind spots. Tests conducted with three-dimensional scanners on some of the most popular models in the North American market show that areas with no direct visibility for the driver are now much larger than in equivalent models from the 1990s or early 2000s. This makes it difficult to detect the presence of pedestrians, especially children, short individuals, or users who are very close to the vehicle.

Several real cases described in the study illustrate the consequences of this issue. In some fatal accidents, drivers claimed not to have seen the victim before the impact. Subsequent reconstructions concluded that structural elements of the vehicle, such as the raised hood, the mirrors, or the side pillars, had significantly limited the field of view.

Automakers argue that new driver assistance systems can compensate for these limitations. Technologies such as automatic emergency braking or pedestrian detection are designed to reduce the risk of collisions. However,

different studies have shown that these systems do not work perfectly in all situations. Factors such as adverse weather, shadows, high speeds, or the presence of children can reduce their effectiveness.

Beyond technical issues, the expansion of SUVs and pickups also responds to economic and cultural reasons. These vehicles generate very high profit margins for manufacturers, who have progressively reduced the production of saloons and other conventional passenger cars. In parallel, advertising campaigns have associated large vehicles with concepts such as safety, prestige, strength, or personal success. This message has contributed to consolidating the perception that a larger vehicle is a better option for many families.

Road safety specialists insist that the size of vehicles is not the only cause of the increase in pedestrian deaths. Urban design, traffic speed, driver distraction, and other factors remain determinants. However, there is increasing evidence that the trend towards taller and bulkier vehicles has increased the risk for the most vulnerable road users.

In conclusion, the growth of SUVs and pickups poses a significant road safety challenge. Despite technological advancements, the combination of higher hoods and larger blind spots increases the severity of accidents and hinders the detection of pedestrians. This phenomenon highlights the need to continue researching and developing measures that better protect the most vulnerable users, balancing the safety of vehicle occupants with that of pedestrians.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

The European Drug Report 2026 highlights an increasingly complex reality for security officials, public administrations, and health professionals. Despite the efforts made over the last few decades, the availability of illicit drugs remains high across Europe, while the constant emergence of new substances and the evolution of criminal markets create new risks and challenges.

One of the main conclusions of the report is the consolidation of an extremely diversified drug market. Cannabis remains the most widely consumed illegal substance, followed by cocaine, which maintains high levels of availability in many European countries. At the same time, synthetic stimulants, such as amphetamines, methamphetamine, and synthetic cathinones, are gaining prominence and expanding the available supply for consumers.

From a security perspective, this scenario implies greater complexity for law enforcement agencies and organisations involved in the fight against drug trafficking. Criminal networks have demonstrated a great capacity for adaptation, taking advantage of new technologies, global trade routes, and digital channels to facilitate the distribution of illegal substances. The production of synthetic drugs within European territory also continues to represent a significant concern, especially due to the ease with which chemical formulas can be modified to evade legal controls.

Another notable element is the increase in new psychoactive substances. Every year, new chemical compounds are detected that appear on the market at a pace that exceeds the regulatory capacity of many states. This phenomenon complicates the identification of risks associated with consumption and increases uncertainty for both emergency services and healthcare systems. Among these substances, synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones, and new synthetic opioids stand out, some of which may have a potency far exceeding that of traditional drugs.

The report also warns about the evolution of the opioid market. Although heroin remains the primary substance in this group, the increasing presence of highly potent synthetic opioids represents an emerging threat. Experience observed in other regions of the world shows that these substances can cause sudden increases in overdoses and drug-related deaths if they are not properly identified and controlled.

Regarding social and health impacts, the use of injectable drugs continues to generate a disproportionate burden of harm, including transmissible infections, hospitalisations, and mortality. Despite the general decrease in this consumption pattern over the last few years, the need to maintain prevention, treatment, and harm reduction programs remains essential.

In light of this situation, security cannot be addressed exclusively from a repressive perspective. The most effective policies combine the prosecution of

organised crime with prevention, education, treatment, and harm reduction measures. Coordination between law enforcement agencies, health authorities, European institutions, and social services is essential to anticipate new threats and reduce the impacts associated with drug consumption.

In conclusion, the European Drug Report 2026 confirms that Europe is facing a dynamic and changing scenario. The diversification of available substances, the constant emergence of new synthetic compounds, and the adaptability of criminal networks demand a comprehensive response based on intelligence, international cooperation, and public health protection. Only through a balanced strategy will it be possible to effectively tackle the security challenges posed by the phenomenon of drugs in the coming years.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

Portugal is still considered one of the safest countries in Europe, both according to official statistics and the main international safety indices. However, the recent evolution of crime shows a more complex reality: while general crime remains relatively stable, some specific phenomena—such as cybercrime, sexual offences, or juvenile delinquency—have increased and cause concern among authorities and the public.

According to the Annual Internal Security Report (RASI), during 2024 Portugal recorded an overall decrease in crime of 4.6%, with 354,878 reports, but violent and serious crimes increased by 2.6%. This apparent contradiction confirms a trend observed in other European countries: traditional crime is decreasing, but forms of criminality with a greater social and media impact are on the rise.

Thefts remain the most common crime, especially in large urban areas and tourist spots such as Lisbon, Porto, or the Algarve. At the same time, a significant increase in vehicle thefts, commercial robberies, and scams related to housing rentals and digital platforms has been detected.

One of the points that concerns the Portuguese security forces the most is the increase in sexual crimes. The number of reported rapes in 2024 increased by nearly 10% compared to the previous year, reaching the highest value of the last decade. Although the authorities attribute part of this increase to a greater willingness of victims to report, the phenomenon also reflects a growing social pressure on prevention and protection mechanisms.

Juvenile crime is another highlighted element. The 2024 RASI recorded more than 2,000 cases linked to minors aged between 12 and 16 years, with an increase of over 12%. Incidents in school environments and episodes of group violence also increased, especially in metropolitan areas. This phenomenon has opened a political and social debate about integration, social exclusion, and the preventive capacity of the educational system.

On the other hand, some structural indicators remain positive. Homicides remain at low levels compared to the European average, with rates below 1 homicide per 100,000 inhabitants. Similarly, domestic violence has decreased for three consecutive years according to official data, although it continues to account for one of the most reported crimes in the country.

Cybercrime is probably the challenge with the most future potential. Digital scams, phishing, identity theft, and cyberattacks have steadily increased following the pandemic. This evolution compels the Portuguese police forces to strengthen technological units and invest in digital intelligence and international cooperation.

Another relevant aspect is the citizens’ perception of insecurity. Various social and political debates in Portugal show a gap between objective data and public perception. There is a growing concern on social media and digital forums regarding immigration, radicalization, and the presence of violent groups, although official statistics do not indicate a widespread deterioration of security.

The Portuguese authorities insist that the country «remains globally safe», but they acknowledge that there are indicators that require constant monitoring and adaptation. In this context, Portugal faces a scenario similar to that of other European societies: less conventional crime, but greater complexity in the threats linked to the digital world, social cohesion, and urban security.

For the private security sector and citizen protection, this evolution implies new needs: greater technological specialization, preventive analysis capacity, and coordination among law enforcement agencies, administrations, and security companies. The security of the future in Portugal will depend both on police response and on the ability to anticipate increasingly hybrid and changing risks.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

Cybersecurity is entering a new phase characterised by the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence in both offensive and defensive operations. For decades, the sector had operated under relatively stable rules: discovering vulnerabilities was a slow process, developing exploits required time and specialist knowledge, and companies had sufficient time to fix bugs before they were widely exploited. This model, however, is changing rapidly.

A recent report from Google shows the extent to which AI is transforming the cybersecurity landscape. According to the document, a criminal entity has been identified for the first time as using artificial intelligence to exploit a zero-day vulnerability capable of bypassing two-factor authentication systems in a popular web management tool. What is most significant is not just the specific attack, but the fact that AI is already being used in a practical and industrialised manner to accelerate offensive processes that previously required weeks or months of human labour.

The report also highlights the increased use of AI by groups linked to China and North Korea. These organisations are already using advanced models to identify vulnerabilities, generate exploits, and automate reconnaissance tasks on potential targets. At the same time, tools and semi-autonomous malware capable of executing entire processes with minimal human intervention are beginning to emerge. Platforms such as OpenClaw Github exemplify this new trend towards systems capable of orchestrating complex offensive operations in an automated manner.

This development implies a radical acceleration of the cybersecurity cycle. Previously, once a critical vulnerability was discovered, attackers needed time to understand it, create a functional exploit and adapt it to real-world environments. Now, AI can reduce this process to hours or even minutes. This eliminates much of the leeway that manufacturers and security teams traditionally had to deploy patches and protective measures.

The change particularly affects the classic model of “responsible disclosure” of vulnerabilities. This system was based on giving manufacturers a period of approximately 90 days before making public a vulnerability discovered by researchers. The model assumed that discovering vulnerabilities was difficult and that it would take attackers time to develop exploitation tools. Today, these assumptions are becoming obsolete.

Several security experts, including security researcher Himanshu Anand, warn that artificial intelligence has completely disrupted these timelines. According to this view, it can no longer be assumed that a researcher is the only one to have discovered a security flaw, because multiple automated systems can identify the same vulnerability simultaneously. Nor can we expect attackers to take weeks to develop exploits after a patch has been released. Current models are capable of generating proof-of-concepts and adapting malicious code almost in real time.

Therefore, the new reality demands a much faster response. Critical vulnerabilities are now treated as top priorities from the very outset. Companies can no longer wait for the next development cycle or the next sprint to apply fixes. Security teams need constant monitoring, immediate response capabilities, and automated tools capable of detecting and fixing threats in real time.

This scenario is also transforming the way software is developed. It will become increasingly difficult to imagine large applications or infrastructures being deployed without exhaustive reviews carried out by advanced artificial intelligence systems. What was seen as a limitation just a year ago – false positives and the “hallucinations” of large language models – is rapidly evolving into the opposite problem: tools that are efficient enough to uncover vulnerabilities that previously went unnoticed by human teams.

The result is a genuine digital arms race. Both attackers and defenders are using increasingly sophisticated AI to gain the upper hand. Organisations wishing to maintain high levels of protection will need to invest in advanced agents, automated analytics platforms, and AI-based detection systems. This will entail significant costs and further increase technological dependence on major AI platforms.

Ultimately, cybersecurity is entering a phase of rapid transformation. Artificial intelligence is no longer merely a supporting tool, but the centrepiece of a new model of digital defence and attack. The debate has shifted very rapidly from questioning whether AI was reliable enough to assuming that it is powerful enough to completely overhaul the traditional rules of IT security.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

French prisons are facing severe structural strain, a situation that is causing concern among both the authorities and security experts. The main problem is chronic overcrowding. According to data from the French Ministry of Justice, at the start of 2025 there were more than 79,000 people in prison, a figure that continued to rise throughout the year to exceed 84,000 inmates, whilst the official capacity of the prison system remains well below this. This disparity results in prison densities exceeding 130% in many facilities, particularly in the maisons d’arrêt, where remand prisoners and those serving short sentences are concentrated.

Overcrowding has direct consequences for internal security. In many French prisons, it is common for two or three inmates to share cells designed for a single person, and there are still cases of prisoners sleeping on mattresses on the floor. This situation increases conflict, makes it difficult for prison staff to maintain control, and encourages the emergence of criminal networks within prisons. Prison staff unions have for years been highlighting staff shortages, a rise in assaults and a general deterioration in working conditions.

On a political level, the debate on prison security has gained momentum following several violent incidents. During 2025, several French prisons were subjected to external attacks involving Molotov cocktails, burnt-out vehicles and even automatic gunfire directed at prison facilities. These incidents raised concerns about the ability of criminal groups to intimidate the state and reinforced the government’s stance in favour of tougher prison policies.

Another sensitive issue is Islamist radicalisation within prisons. France regards prisons as one of the main venues for jihadist recruitment and indoctrination. Following the terrorist attacks of recent years, the prison service has developed special monitoring units for radicalised inmates and enhanced surveillance programmes. However, several experts point out that staff shortages and a lack of resources make it difficult to effectively segregate radical prisoners from the rest of the prison population. This turns some prisons into spaces where extremist rhetoric is spread and criminal networks are strengthened.

Recidivism is also a key issue. Many experts criticise the French prison system for remaining too focused on punishment and not enough on rehabilitation. The lack of educational activities, the psychological deterioration of inmates and the difficulties in finding employment after release contribute to maintaining high recidivism rates, particularly among young people involved in urban crime and drug trafficking.

In response to this situation, the French government is primarily committed to expanding prison capacity through the construction of new prisons and high-security centres. President Emmanuel Macron has advocated strengthening the prison system to regain control over organised crime and street violence. However, human rights organisations and various sectors of the judiciary believe that building more prisons will not solve the underlying problem unless the excessive use of pre-trial detention is reduced and more effective alternatives to imprisonment are developed.

In short, the French prison system faces a combination of overcrowding, social tension, radicalisation and internal insecurity, making it one of the country’s major public security challenges. The situation reflects France’s difficulties in balancing a tough stance on crime, crime control and respect for human rights against a backdrop of growing political pressure on security policies.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

Europol has published the 2026 edition of the Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (IOCTA), one of the key reports on the evolution of cybercrime in Europe. The document, titled «How encryption, proxies, and AI are expanding cybercrime», analyses how emerging technologies—especially artificial intelligence, end-to-end encryption, and cryptocurrencies—are transforming the landscape of digital threats.

The report highlights that cybercrime is becoming increasingly sophisticated, decentralised, and professionalised. According to Europol, criminal groups swiftly exploit any technological advancement to enhance their operations, hinder investigations, and expand the scope of their attacks. This situation compels law enforcement agencies and public and private organisations to strengthen their technical capabilities and international cooperation.

One of the highlights of the IOCTA 2026 is the role of the dark web as an essential infrastructure of cybercrime. Despite police operations in recent years, illegal markets and criminal forums continue to show a great capacity for recovery. When a platform is dismantled, more fragmented, specialised, and secure alternatives quickly emerge. Moreover, the combination of anonymised services and platforms with end-to-end encryption is blurring the line between the surface web and the dark web, further complicating investigative tasks.

Cryptocurrencies remain a key element in the digital criminal ecosystem. The report particularly highlights the growing use of so-called «privacy coins» and offshore exchange services to launder money derived from ransomware and other illicit activities. These tools greatly hinder the traceability of transactions and pose a significant challenge for the authorities. Europol also warns about the increase in the indirect involvement of minors and young adults in money laundering activities related to cryptocurrencies, often without being fully aware of the legal implications.

Artificial intelligence emerges as one of the main accelerators of online fraud. Cybercriminals use generative AI tools to create more convincing messages, personalise social engineering techniques, and automate large-scale fraudulent campaigns. These technologies allow for the production of e-mails, SMS messages, or fake content with a very high level of realism. This is supplemented by techniques such as caller ID spoofing, which allows for the falsification of the identity of phone calls, and SIM farms, capable of sending thousands of messages and simultaneous communications.

Regarding cyberattacks, ransomware remains one of the main threats. The IOCTA 2026 highlights that, during 2025, numerous variants and active groups were detected, many of which have evolved into double extortion models: they not only encrypt the victims’ information but also threaten to publish the stolen data if the ransom is not paid. This strategy increases the pressure on businesses and public institutions and makes data protection a critical security factor.

The report also warns about the growing connection between criminal actors and state-sponsored hybrid threats. Some cybercrime groups act as intermediaries or proxies in political destabilisation or espionage operations. This convergence between organised crime and geopolitical interests represents a new risk scenario for critical infrastructure, public administrations, and large technology companies.

Another of the most concerning points is the increase in onlinechild sexual exploitation. Europol reports an increase in cases of sexual extortion, as well as the commercialisation of child sexual abuse material for economic purposes. There is also concern about the growth of synthetic content generated with artificial intelligence, which creates new technical and legal challenges for identifying victims and pursuing those responsible. Encrypted messaging platforms have become a common space for this type of criminal activity.

In this context, the report particularly mentions The Com, a network of online criminal communities linked to extremely violent activities. According to Europol, these environments combine online child sexual exploitation, extortion, cyberattacks, and other forms of serious violence, creating highly dangerous and difficult-to-infiltrate criminal ecosystems.

Finally, the IOCTA 2026 emphasises the need for a coordinated response among governments, law enforcement, technology companies, and international organisations. Europol insists that the fight against cybercrime will require greater technical capabilities, regulation adapted to new digital challenges, and much closer global cooperation. The report thus consolidates itself as an essential strategic guide for understanding how digital threats are evolving and how to prepare for an increasingly complex and hostile environment.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

Researcher Clare McGlynn, an expert in violence against women and girls, warns that the latest generation of artificial intelligence chatbots is facilitating new forms of abuse with concerning scale and intensity. Although the relationship between technology and gender-based violence is not new—including sexual deepfakes or image-based abuse—McGlynn believes that chatbots represent a qualitative change. Her research documents how these tools, often available for free, allow users to simulate scenarios of rape, incest, and child sexual abuse, as well as other forms of gender-based violence.

As reported by Patricia Clarke on observer.co.uk, this report coincides with an investigation by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), which highlights a rapid increase in child sexual abuse material generated by AI. The data is particularly alarming: in 2025, thousands of AI-generated videos were identified, with an exponential increase compared to the previous year. In addition, a significant proportion of this content is classified at the highest levels of severity. Girls represent the vast majority of victims in this type of material, which evidences a clear gender bias in the harm caused.

Reports agree that the problem is not only the misuse of technology but also the design decisions of the platforms. When companies prioritise growth and user acquisition over security, they create environments that facilitate abuse. In particular, open-source AI models are highlighted as a risk factor, as any user can download them, modify them, and remove their safeguards. This accessibility has been celebrated in dark web forums, where some users see AI as a tool to materialise illegal fantasies with a high degree of realism.

One of the most concerning areas is that of role-playing applications and companies, where chatbots act as fictional interlocutors. Platforms with millions of users allow for the creation of characters that can represent abusive or sexualised situations, including minors. The lack of effective control over this content and the ease of access to it amplify the risks, especially for young users.

McGlynn defines this phenomenon as «chatbot-simulated violence» and emphasises that it is a problem that is still very scarcely visible in academic research. Despite the abundance of studies on AI security, there is a significant lack of analysis focused on gender impact. This invisibility may contribute to perpetuating systemic risks as technology evolves.

In terms of regulation, experts believe that the current response is insufficient and fragmented. Some measures, such as restricting access to certain applications or prohibiting them in certain countries, are seen as limited steps that do not address the structural problem: the very design of the platforms. In this context, McGlynn proposes the creation of a new criminal offence for the «dangerous deployment of AI chatbots», which would hold companies accountable for not implementing adequate harm prevention measures.

At the same time, the IWF demands that security by design become a mandatory standard, including pre-launch testing and independent audit mechanisms. Political movements are also taking place: in the United Kingdom, the House of Lords has proposed introducing criminal liabilities for providers of unsafe chatbots, and there are plans to include these services within online safety legislation. However, critics point out that there is still a lack of a specific regulator and clear obligations to ensure safety before products reach the public.

Ultimately, the reports reveal a growing tension between technological innovation and the protection of fundamental rights. Without more forceful interventions, there is a risk that AI will not only reflect but also amplify existing forms of violence, especially against women and girls. For security professionals, this implies the need to adopt a proactive approach based on prevention, responsibility, and the ethical design of emerging technologies.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

The year 2024 has confirmed a positive trend in terms of safety in the United States, with a widespread decrease in both violent crimes and property crimes. According to official data based on incidents recorded by law enforcement, crime shows a significant decrease compared to 2023, consolidating an improvement that affects nearly all analysed categories.

As for violent crimes—which include homicides, rapes, robberies with violence, and aggravated assaults—the overall rate has been 370.8 incidents per 100,000 inhabitants, representing a reduction of 6% compared to the previous year. This decrease is not uniform, but it is widespread: all types of violent crimes have experienced a decline.

Notably, the reduction in homicides stands out, which has decreased by 16%, resulting in a rate of 5.1 per 100,000 inhabitants. This decline is particularly relevant, as it concerns the crime with the greatest social and media impact. A decrease is also observed in robberies (−9%), rapes (−6%), and aggravated assaults (−5%), although the latter remains the most common type of violent crime.

In parallel, property crimes—which includeburglaries, thefts, and vehicle thefts—have also experienced a notable reduction. The overall rate has decreased by 9%, from 2,019.7 to 1,835.1 incidents per 100,000 inhabitants. Among these, the most notable decrease corresponds to vehicle theft, with a drop of 19%, followed by thefts and burglaries, which also show a downward trend.

These data not only reflect a reduction in the number of crimes but also in victimisation, that is, in the number of affected persons. The violent crime victimisation rate has decreased to 376.9 per 100,000 inhabitants, while property crime victimisation has fallen by 12%. This indicates that the improvement is not only statistical but also has a real impact on the safety perceived by the population.

Despite this positive trend, the territorial analysis reveals significant differences between states. Some, like New Mexico, have rates significantly higher than the national average for both violent crimes and property crimes. Instead, other states like Maine or Idaho register considerably lower levels. In total, 14 states exceed the national average in violent crimes and 16 in property crimes, highlighting the persistence of regional inequalities in terms of security.

Regarding the characteristics of the victims, the data show a decrease in victimisation among various demographic groups, including white, black, and Asian individuals. However, no statistically significant changes have been detected in other groups, such as Hispanic people or Native American populations, which points to the need to continue developing more inclusive and specific security policies.

Overall, the results for 2024 suggest a favourable evolution of crime in the United States, with consistent declines in almost all major indicators. However, the persistence of territorial and demographic differences indicates that there are still significant challenges to be addressed. From a security perspective, these data reinforce the importance of maintaining and adapting prevention and response strategies, placing special emphasis on the most vulnerable areas and groups.

Ultimately, 2024 can be considered a year of improvement in terms of public safety, but also a reminder that the fight against crime requires constant vigilance and detailed analysis to ensure that progress is sustainable and equitable.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

Germany is traditionally considered one of the safest countries in Europe due to its strong institutions, a professional police force, and a consolidated judicial system. However, in recent years, the debate on public safety has gained importance due to the increase in certain forms of crime, as well as social changes and new threats such as political radicalisation or cybercrime.

According to police statistics, approximately 5.94 million crimes were recorded in Germany in 2023, representing an increase of 5.5% compared to the previous year. This increase is partly explained by the recovery of social and economic life after the COVID-19 pandemic, a period during which many crimes decreased due to mobility restrictions and limitations on daily activities. With the return to normality, various types of crime have returned to levels similar to or even higher than those before 2020.

One of the aspects that concerns the authorities the most is the increase in interpersonal violence. In 2023, more than 214,000 violent crimes were recorded, the highest figure in the last fifteen years. This type of crime includes serious assaults, violent robberies, and other forms of physical violence. There has also been an increase in knife attacks and episodes of street violence in certain areas.

In addition, sexual offences have also shown an upward trend in recent years. Reports of rape and sexual assault have notably increased, which has generated debate about the need to strengthen prevention measures, improve victim protection, and enhance the effectiveness of police investigations.

Although these increases do exist in some areas, it is important to contextualize the data. In the long term, crime in Germany has significantly decreased since the late 20th century. This decline is partly explained by the improvement of security policies, technological advances in protection systems, and better coordination between police and judicial institutions.

The distribution of crime is not homogeneous across the territory. Large cities concentrate a significant portion of recorded crimes, especially those related to thefts, burglaries, and assaults. Cities like Berlin, Bremen, or Hamburg have higher crime rates, while some federal states like Bavaria record lower levels and higher police resolution rates.

Thefts and burglaries continue to be one of the most frequent categories within crime statistics. After the pandemic, there has also been a rise in burglaries in homes and private spaces. Another phenomenon that is particularly concerning is the increase in politically motivated crimes. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in these incidents, especially those linked to the far right.

There have also been recorded violent incidents against migrants, religious communities, and individuals from the LGTBIQ+ community, as well as an increase in antisemitic crimes. These trends reflect a certain radicalisation in some sectors of society.

Cybercrime is another of the major challenges today. Cyberattacks, digital fraud, and other internet-related economic crimes are becoming increasingly sophisticated and often have an international dimension. Although some statistics show a slight reduction in reported cases, authorities believe that many of these crimes go unreported, especially in the business sector, and that economic damages continue to rise.

To tackle these challenges, Germany has strengthened its specialised units in digital research and increased international cooperation among security forces.

The German security system is based on a federal structure in which police responsibility mainly falls on the federal states, while the federal government coordinates competencies related to border security, the fight against terrorism, and national or international criminal investigations.

In response to new security challenges, authorities have implemented various measures such as increasing police presence in public spaces, modernising the technology of security forces, and expanding digital investigation capabilities. Legislative reforms have also been proposed to restrict the use of bladed weapons in public spaces and to strengthen surveillance in certain urban areas.

In conclusion, Germany remains a relatively safe country compared to many other European and world states. However, the recent evolution of crime shows a more complex situation, marked by new challenges such as street violence, political radicalisation, and digital threats.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français

In the discussions on public safety in Latin America, a false dilemma is often posed: either a «hardline» approach against crime or addressing the structural causes of violence. This dichotomy simplifies a much more complex reality. Truly effective policies do not choose between repression or prevention, but rather combine the ability to act urgently with sustainable strategies that reinforce justice, institutional legitimacy, and social cohesion.

In contexts of chronic insecurity, the demand for immediate results is understandable. When families live with daily fear, quick and visible responses generate tangible relief. The recent experience ofEl Salvador, with the declaration of a state of emergency and the implementation of massive incarceration measures, has been presented as a success story due to the drastic reduction of homicides and other crimes. This approach has increased citizen support for the government and has strengthened the perception of control. However, it has also opened a deep debate about the costs in terms of process, fundamental rights, and democratic quality.

The «tough on crime» approach is politically attractive for three main reasons. Firstly, it provides immediate results in contexts marked by electoral urgency and media pressure. Secondly, it is easy to communicate: incarcerations, police deployments, and large-scale operations are visible actions that are simple to explain. Thirdly, it concentrates power in the State and reduces spaces for accountability. In contrast, preventive strategies require inter-institutional coordination, time, and a more sophisticated narrative.

Now, social prevention alone is also not enough, especially in contexts with a high presence of organised crime. International research shows that sustained reduction of violence requires the effective integration of the criminal justice system with social services, community programs, and targeted interventions on risk factors. The key is not to weaken the State, but to make it more precise, legitimate, and strategic.

Scientific evidence points to four fundamental principles for a balanced security policy.

1. Focusing on high-risk individuals, places, and behaviours.
Violence is not distributed evenly: it is concentrated in small groups and specific territories. Evidence-based interventions—such as focused deterrence strategies applied in cities like Boston or Oakland—have demonstrated significant reductions in gun violence. In Chicago, programmes that combined cognitive behavioural therapy with youth engagement significantly reduced arrests for violent crimes among high-risk youth. These experiences show that acting with precision is more effective than applying indiscriminate measures.

2. Strengthening community capacity to prevent conflicts.
Local organisations, mediators, mentors, and civic justice programmes are key players in prevention. Initiatives such as the District Justice System of Bogotá or civic justice models implemented in various cities in Mexico have improved access to conflict resolution and the perception of institutional legitimacy. When communities have a solid social infrastructure, violence tends to decrease steadily.

3. Building legitimacy through fairness and procedural justice.
People comply with the law not only out of fear of punishment, but because they perceive the authorities as fair and respectful. Police training experiences in procedural justice in Mexico City have increased citizen satisfaction and reduced complaints. Institutional legitimacy is a strategic asset: it enhances cooperation, facilitates crime investigation, and strengthens social cohesion.

4. Strategic spatial interventions.
Improving the physical environment—lighting, restoration of degraded spaces, creation of green spaces—can reduce violence, especially in high-risk neighbourhoods. These actions are visible, relatively inexpensive, and reinforce the perception of institutional presence without resorting to direct confrontation.

Beyond the content of the policies, communication is decisive. Local leaders must avoid the polarised framework of «tolerance versus repression» and present security as a condition for economic development, health, education, and democratic quality. The central message should be that when violence is organised, the response must also be organised: coordination among police, justice, social services, and the community.

This implies prioritising accuracy over harshness, combining accountability with reintegration opportunities, and giving a voice to trusted messengers—mayors, police leaders, community leaders, or victims—who connect with the real concerns of the citizenry.

Ultimately, overcoming the false dilemma between a hardline approach and prevention is essential for moving towards more effective, fair, and sustainable security models. Balanced strategies do not renounce the authority of the State, but rather reinforce it through legitimacy, evidence, and collaboration. Security is not just the absence of crime; it is the foundation upon which prosperity and democratic trust are built.

_____

Aquest apunt en català / Esta entrada en español / Post en français